With their third studio full-length It's Blitz!,
the Yeah Yeah Yeahs uncork a heady new
brew of sonic delights with producers
Nick Launay and Dave Sitek.
We’ve all heard how a shark has to
keep constantly moving forward or it
dies, and the same usually goes for a
rock band that’s banked its reputation
on being edgy, engaging, and aheadof-
the-curve. For New York City’s Yeah
Yeah Yeahs, their “shark moment”
came when the trio reconvened in
early 2008 to begin work on their latest
album. Collectively, they decided
not just to leave behind the jagged
art-punk sound of their 2006 breakthrough
Show Your Bones (and the
follow-up EP Is Is), but to deconstruct
and retool it entirely.
The opening salvo originated
with lead singer Karen O, who made
the seemingly innocent suggestion
to guitarist Nick Zinner that he
might consider trying out some
new instruments. For anyone even
remotely familiar with the YYY
sound, that’s almost like asking
Peter Max to give up his brush, but
Zinner didn’t flinch.
“There’s already been some talk
about this album, with people saying,
‘He’s putting down the guitar! There’s
no guitar on the record!’” he says,
referring to a recent Spin cover story
with a dismissive laugh. “The reality
is there’s still tons of guitar on here,
but I’m constantly looking for new
sounds anyway. Karen’s idea just
goes with our band ethos of not
repeating ourselves, because we’re
always trying to evolve.”
It’s Blitz! [Interscope] marks an
evolution on multiple levels. The band
enlisted two topflight producers—
British expat Nick Launay (known for
his work on PiL’s legendary Flowers of
Romance, and to YYY fans for Is Is, as
well as recent albums by Nick Cave,
Supergrass, and Silverchair) and longtime
friend and confidante David
Andrew Sitek from TV on the Radio,
who has worked closely with YYY
since their 2003 debut Fever to Tell.
What’s more, It’s Blitz! embraces retro
new-wave pop, but with a thick low
end and deep-space atmospherics
worthy of Björk, Massive Attack, or
Goldfrapp—all of whom have felt the
touch of the album’s mix engineer
Mark “Spike” Stent [see sidebar, “Jedi
Master” on page 22].
Meanwhile, Karen O exudes a brighter,
sunnier, and more confident mood
throughout—a change that might have
as much to do with her relocation to
L.A. several years ago as it does her
rise to maturity. Drummer Brian Chase
sounds tighter and drier, giving the
music plenty of room to stretch out
and breathe. And Zinner flexes his
burgeoning chops on an ARP Omni 2
synthesizer and a phalanx of other
synths and effects pedals, proving his
thirst for new sounds is only just getting
started.
“It was really about going in without
any plan,” Launay says, recalling
the first winter sessions he had with
the band. “I think the important thing
to know about this album is that they
went in with maybe one or two tunes,
but the majority of the material was
written completely in the studio. That
was more common back in the ’80s
when I started making records. It’s a
very unusual approach these days,
and I think the reason they wanted to
do that was specifically to come up
with something new and fresh.”
ENTHUSIASTIC PING-PONG
A total of five studios figured in the
making of It’s Blitz!, but the main
venues for tracking were Long View
Farm in Massachusetts and Sonic
Ranch in Texas (with Launay), and
Sitek’s former Stay Gold Studio in
Brooklyn. “We started in the winter
at Long View and then we went to
Sonic Ranch,” Launay explains. “The
last lot of overdubs were done at
The Boat in Silverlake [L.A.], and
there were little bits and pieces done
at Seedy Underbelly in L.A., which is
the studio that I usually work out of,
just off Laurel Canyon.”
Sitek spent about three weeks in
July with the band at Stay Gold, while
he and Launay would frequently trade
Pro Tools sessions, building tracks and
adding to each other’s work as time
went on. The scope of the project
became huge: Each of the album’s ten
songs went through at least four or
five different versions, consisting of
sometimes more than 100 tracks per
song, and eventually taking up more
than a dozen 250GB hard drives.
You don’t often hear of two major
producers trading licks like this on
one album—especially on this scale.
Launay:That’s why I think the
album works so well, because Dave
and I pretty much played what I like to
call enthusiastic ping-pong. I would
capture the band when they were
writing and put all the best elements
together with a lot of editing; maybe
I’d grab something and put it in backwards,
or switch out a chorus for a
verse—things like that. Then it would
go to Dave, and he might scrap this or
that, try something new, and send it
back to me and I’d go, “Holy shit!
What happened to all those ideas?
This is really good!” There was never
any competition—in fact I found it all
quite amusing.
Sitek: It was all pretty open. A lot
of it was the band being like, “Okay
let’s take it to Nick’s world,” and then,
“Now let’s take it to Dave’s world.”
Launay: We actually had one conversation.
I rang Dave to ask him a
question about a song. I’d heard that
he’s a very strong-willed character,
but he was totally graceful and nice
about it. He even told me, “Man, I’m so
glad that you’re okay with what I’m
doing, because if someone came
along and f**ked up my stuff the way
I’ve been f**king up yours, I wouldn’t
be too happy.” [Laughs.]
SYNTHESIZE ME
From Nick Zinner’s perspective, his
approach to getting guitar and synth
sounds was equally wide open.
Aside from the ARP Omni 2 he
picked up on eBay (and which provides
the bulk of sounds for the
oddly mystical ballad “Skeletons”),
he also availed himself of Sitek’s
huge array of synths, including the
Yamaha CS-15—a staple on almost
everything Sitek has ever recorded.
It helps drive the arpeggiated bass
lines, along with a Roland Juno-106,
of the uptempo first single “Zero,”
while an ARP Solina String Ensemble
and a Crumar Trilogy provide the
strings and pads oscillating in the
song’s upper reaches.
Then there’s the mind-boggling
sonic palette that Zinner is able to
wrench from his main guitar—an ’80s
Strat that he’s had since childhood—
with the help of such exotic pedals as
Line 6’s DL4 Delay Modeler and MM4
Modulation Modeler, Eventide’s Time-
Factor and ModFactor, DigiTech’s
Whammy and Hyper Phase, and a
beat-up Roland RE-201 Space Echo,
which he uses primarily for distortion
filters. With so many choices at hand,
Zinner can dial up guitar sounds
that can easily be mistaken for
synths; for a prime taste, check out
the whistling—and Whammy-fied—
melody that anchors the catchy “Soft
Shock,” the only song on the album
where Zinner played a vintage
Fender Jaguar.
What were the basics of your guitar
setup?
Zinner:I like to go through two
amps at the same time—a Vox AC30
and a Fender [Hot Rod] DeVille, for
example—and then mic those up differently,
as well as going direct. We
really wanted to get away from the
classic big room sound, so I did blends
of those different signals. I usually put
the guitar into a [Pro Co] RAT first,
then the Line 6 Mod, then the
Whammy, then the Line 6 Delay, and
into the amps.
Launay:We usually had five tracks
of Nick’s guitar on every song. We’d
have two mics on the Vox, which were
usually a Beyer M 88 and an AKG 414,
with the 414 very flat up against the
grille and the 88 at an angle. The combination
of them being slightly out of
phase with each other is what gives it
the basic sound, and then you can
manipulate the balance.
On the DeVille, I’d have another 88
and a ribbon mic like a Royer or an
old RCA 44. Very often I’d use a combination
of any of the four mics—
again, I might use two of them and
put them out of phase with each
other, or sometimes delay one of
them, and then all of these would go
through a combination of API and
Neve preamps.
With the DI, sometimes that would
be after all the pedals, so it would be
very fuzzy if he was using a [fOXX]
fuzz pedal, let’s say. And we would
replug things constantly—it was like
spaghetti junction in there. If we
wanted to go back and recreate
some of those sounds, it would be
almost impossible. We just had to
record everything.
On “Zero,” how did you “warm up”
the signal path of the synths on the
way into Pro Tools?
Sitek:For most of that I used the
Wunder Audio 1073s and the Retro
[Instruments] 176 [Limiting Amplifier].
I’m going direct, so older synths
like the Yamaha CS-15 tend to need a
little makeup gain on the output.
What I like to do is take it to the
absolute maximum that I can on the
1073s, and then draw it back in by
turning the gain down a little bit in
the compression stage. That keeps it
really bright and frizzly—that’s the
technical term. [Laughs.] By that I
mean everything above 2k, where the
air starts to distort.
VOCALS WITH ATTITUDE
The lion’s share of Karen O’s vocals
were tracked by Launay at Sonic
Ranch using a Neumann M 49, which
he also prefers specifically for the
way it distorts. “When you get close
to it, it cracks up in the same way
that a Shure SM57 does,” he says. “To
me, it’s one of the few tube mics that
has the midrange of a dynamic mic,
which I think is very important when
you’re doing rock and roll. If you use
a really nice mic on a singer who’s
gonna give it some attitude, you’re not
gonna capture that with a delicioussounding
mic. You want something
that sounds a little bit more earthy
and urban.”
Karen O is at her strongest and most
riveting on “Hysteric”—a dreamy, almost
mournful performance that channels
equal parts Chrissie Hynde and Karen’s
own soulful emergence as a singer with
real emotive power. Her sound gets an
added boost from Spike Stent’s beautifully
designed mix, which subtly guides
her voice through varying movements
of cool crispness, shimmery delay, and
needle-clipping distortion.
Can you describe the room at
Sonic Ranch where you tracked
vocals?
Launay:It has a wooden floor with
plaster walls, just like a normal living
room, but the ceiling is very high.
Karen was positioned in between a
couple of slightly padded screens—
with some amazingly colorful material,
by the way, so there was a vibe there
too—so if she sang loudly, then you
would hear the room, but if she sang
softly you wouldn’t. I would say compared
to the way most people record
vocals, it sounded quite live.
How do you use EQ and compression
to preserve that attitude that
Karen delivers?
Launay:Another thing I like about
the M 49 mic is that it gives you this
incredible low-mid boost when you get
close to it, so when I run Karen’s vocal
into a Neve 1081, I just leave the
midrange alone. I’ll boost at about
300Hz to give the sound some thickness,
and then a similar amount at
100Hz. I usually boost at 15k, too—I
find that the 1081s have the top-end
control that’s really good for fine-tuning
at that frequency.
Then I go into a Tube-Tech CL 1A
compressor, which I really like because
the attack and release are both very
fast. They’re very similar to an 1176 in
the way they’re set up, but they sound
a lot warmer and better suited to sibilance
than an 1176. Generally, the combination
of the M 49 and the Tube-Tech
is fantastic. I’ll set it at the fastest possible
attack and fastest possible
release for Karen’s voice, and compress
so that it’s pinning—so the needle is
hitting the end stop on the left-hand
side when she’s at her loudest. It
comes very close to sounding like analog
tape distortion.
Did you treat her voice with any
other effects before the final mixing
phase?
Launay:One thing I used on all the
monitor mixes that we were doing, and
in Karen’s headphones generally, was a
Roland CE-301 Chorus Echo. I used
that as the slapback and reverb
because there’s a cheap built-in reverb
in there that works really well with
Karen’s vocal. I know that made it onto
a few of the songs, and I’m pretty sure
Spike may have used it because I told
him I thought it sounded great.
Sitek:
DRUMS FOR DAYS
There aren’t many rock drummers who
will actually tune their drums to the
key of a song—in fact, you’d be hardpressed
to find any besides Brian Chase,
whose conservatory training at Oberlin
College made him somewhat of an
anomaly among Brooklyn kit bangers
when the Yeah Yeah Yeahs were first
coming up. Chase has a number of
tuneful moments on It’s Blitz!, but his
tom arrangement on the reverberating
album closer “Little Shadow” is
probably one of his best.
“The room gives the drums a natural
reflective sound on that,” he
says, “but that’s also Nick Launay’s
touch after the fact. I remember with
the kick-drum sound in particular, he
would dupe a track and then run it
through a SansAmp setting to give it
a little fuzz.” In fact, aside from the
album’s two “live” tracks with the full
band—“Dull Life” and “Shame and
Fortune”—sonic manipulation was
the order of the day for capturing
and cataloguing new drum sounds.
Dave Sitek has mentioned that
he recorded different parts of the
drum kit separately for the last TV
on the Radio album. Is that how you
guys worked together, too?
Chase:Yeah. In general for this
album, we were essentially going
for a very muted kick and snare
sound, so a lot of the drums were
recorded pieces at a time. We
would record a kick and snare track
first; because there were no cymbals
or toms, it gave us a lot of flexibility
to mold the character of
those sounds. Then we would layer
the tracks from there—usually multiple
hi-hat tracks, and then cymbals
on top of that.
Was there a basic way you got
that muted sound—for example, on
“Dragon Queen?”
Chase:I think the kick on that was
a 24-inch double-headed kick that
was stuffed with blankets. The muting
on the snare was just a wallet resting
on top, which worked against me a
few times because I would end up
leaving the studio without it. [Laughs.]
The drums on that song almost
sound like an old drum machine.
How did you record them?
Sitek:Generally, I use the
Microtech Gefell M 930 on the snare,
but on that particular one I think we
actually went way out on a limb and
used an SM57. [Laughs.] I recorded
the kick with a Neumann U 47.
You’ve gotta be real careful in terms
of wind with that, so I doubled up
the kick shell with another empty
shell in front of it, and then put the
mic in that shell and carpet the
whole thing. That gives it a little
more space between the head and
the microphone, but you don’t really
sacrifice distance because it’s all in
its own chamber.
You must have done something
on the way into Pro Tools.
Sitek:Everyone asks me what I
use on the drums, and I’m like, “Well,
who’s the drummer? Is he on acid?”
[Laughs.] One thing I will say is that
I’m big about low cuts. I cut the lows
out of almost everything, so that
when I finally do the bass, you can
hear every aspect of it. The kick and
the human voice are my priorities in
every song that I work on.
Can you give us a hint, though?
Sitek:Well, I mod those Dolby
A-Type [Model] 361s to compress
just the high end and disregard the
low end. Those are my favorite
things on earth. I’ll put Karen’s vocal
through those things, too. If you
want the crispy tippy top to stand
out and you don’t want to deal with
an EQ or a mix issue, the 361s are
great for that.
JEDI MASTER
Dave Sitek refers to Spike Stent as
the “Obi-Wan Kenobi of mixing.”
Welcome to his inner sanctum.
Studio G at L.A.’s Chalice Recording
Studios is outfitted with an SSL
4080 G console, and for a while
now it’s been the main base of operations
for Mark “Spike” Stent. More
than just a mix engineer, Stent has
built a sterling reputation over the
years for truly shaping and crafting
a mix, using filters and effects
largely at his discretion once he gets
creative input from an artist. The
approach must be working; his
client list includes everyone from U2
to Radiohead, and he has more on
the horizon.
“I love the SSL Gs,” Stent raves. “I
don’t particularly like mixing on any
other console. I basically use a mixture
of the console and plug-ins and
automation on Pro Tools or Logic;
for the Yeah Yeah Yeahs album, it
was Pro Tools. I was brought up oldschool,
so I like the analog sound
because it has a certain toughness,
and I find it a lot easier to get what I
want quickly out of that.”
From the layered guitar and
synth atmospherics that coat the
tail-out section of “Dragon Queen”
to the subtle variations in texture
of Karen O’s vocal on “Hysteric,”
Stent folds himself seamlessly into
some of the finishing aspects of It’s
Blitz! He favors a number of
SoundToys effects plug-ins, including
EchoBoy and FilterFreak, but
uses them judiciously in conjunction
with the console, accessing
automation controls in the box as
well as on the desk itself.
“Karen had tracked up
‘Hysteric’ quite a lot,” Stent
observes, “but where she sings the
actual word in the background, I
stuck it through EchoBoy. I also
time-adjusted her vocals in places,
so one side would go left and one
would go right with a very short
delay; that makes it sound wider,
phase-y, and a bit more 3D. I also
have a dual chain that I tend to use
where I’ll split the vocal up to two
channels and EQ them differently.
One goes through an LA-2A and
the other goes through this bluestripe,
black reissue special edition
1176, which I use on everything.”
In the end, Stent had options
galore; not only were the Pro Tools
sessions delivered to him in all their
multitracked (and color-coded)
glory, but producers Launay and
Sitek also included loads of extra
“grayed-out” tracks that Stent
could activate if he was looking for
something different.
“Dave and Nick did amazing
jobs,” he says, “and the soundscapes
that they created for me to work
from were incredible. And nothing
should be taken away from Nick
Zinner. He’s an incredible guitarist,
and I feel he completely reinvented
himself on this record. There are
traditional fans who are gonna go,
‘What’s happened?’ but I think it’s
important for bands to try new
things, and not just do the same
record all over again.”