Welcome to EQ magazine - For audio and home recording studio equipment and software
EQ magazine is the definitive source for audio and home recording studio equipment and software. Our information covers all of your music and digital recording requirements and studios from New York to Los Angeles.
|
Skip to [ End of Music Player Network web site links
]
|
|
Your current location
EqMag.com >> This Month >> Peavey M1 And M2 Studio Pro Series Mics
Skip to [ Story Content and jump story attachments ]
Meet a Pair of Condenser Contenders
Peavey M1 AND M2 Studio PRO Series Mics| October, 2007Admittedly, in the recording world, Peavey is not the first manufacturer that comes to my mind when discussing studio mics — to me, the company is synonymous with guitars, basses, amps, live sound gear, and the like. Why? Because while they’ve produced some great recording tools over the years (some of which were truly innovative, like the StudioMix), many of their products have flown “under the radar.” Now here we are with two (relatively) new mics in hand, and they say Peavey right on the box. Will they help focus more attention on what Peavey can bring to the studio? OVERVIEWFirst off, both mics are condensers. Cosmetically they are very similar, but there are some important differences. For example, the M1 has a cardioid pattern only, while the M2 allows choosing among cardioid, omni, and figure eight patterns. And diaphragms? The M1 has one and (surprise!) the M2 has two. Now to the similarities: Both mics are based around large capsules with gold membranes. They each have a –10dB pad (which, when engaged, allows either mic to handle 140dB without distorting). They also both sport a low frequency rolloff feature, offer an overall response of 30Hz to 20kHz, and include a swivel mount and case. Now that we’ve covered the basics, let’s listen to how they perform. APPLICATIONFirst impression from the requisite “plug them in, sing through them, and see how they sound” test: dark. Now, that’s not a bad thing — there are many applications in which you’ll find that character incredibly useful. But they are definitely not on the “bright” or “shrill” end of the scale. So I try them as drum overheads. Why? Because nowadays I use overheads primarily for cymbals. Fifteen years ago, I would have been looking for my overheads to pick up pieces of the entire kit, minus the kick. But now that I have unlimited tracks (thanks to digital!) and can use multiple mics to pick up each drum (as well as the room), I find myself lowering overheads and placing them strategically towards the cymbals so that the mics’ primary task is capturing the cymbals. This application is where darker mics come in extremely handy — most cymbals can use a bit of mellowing, and dark mics perform that function well. This was certainly the case with these mics. I set the M2 to cardioid so that it matched the M1, engaged the –10dB pads on both, and sent them through the preamps of my DDA DVM224v console, directly to Pro Tools. Starting at about 28" above the cymbals, I noticed the mics’ low-end frequency response combated the harsh, “shrilly” quality of the cymbals — but I thought it would be appropriate to add a little more brightness. Lowering the mics to around 15" above the cymbals, about one foot apart from each other and cocked outwards away from one another, added just enough brightness to the sound. The positioning of the mics (facing away from each other) gave a good stereo image of the cymbals, and I was very happy with the resulting sound. Next I tried the M1 and the M2 paired with a Shure SM57 (running into a Nice Pair preamp with a moderate gain stage, and into Pro Tools) on a Mesa Boogie Triple Rectifier (the source guitar was a ’60s Gibson Les Paul). With the 57 around two fingers from the grill, off-axis from the speaker, and the M1 and M2 both about 20" from the amp, I had to engage the pads to cool down the cranked signal. As I expected, the sound was a bit dark due to the low frequency response, so I flipped the rolloff switch to see how it would sound. It wasn’t bad, but I decided we would be better off focusing on room sounds. So I took the M1 away, flipped the M2 into the omni pattern, and moved the mic a few inches closer to the amp. Bingo: The result was a really balanced, even sound — part room and part amp.
|
EQ Magazine is part of the Music Player Network.

